PDA

View Full Version : Who's crazy now?


Second Front
January 29th, 2004, 10:11 AM
Somebody tell our CIC to get a grip. On reality, that is. This is the second time he's claimed we went to war because Saddam wouldn't let the inspectors back in. Now, we all know Saddam was and is a bad guy. But Mr. Bush, please wake up. He did let the UN inspectors back in, no matter what you keep saying, as Joe Conason has observed in Salon:

The president was fantasizing again this afternoon about the circumstances that led to war -- and if his remarks at his press conference with the Polish president are to be taken seriously, he also seems badly confused about his Iraqi timeline. This was Bush's first attempt to answer the damning findings of David Kay, departing director of the Iraq Survey Group. It didn't go well, although almost everyone in the White House press corps pretended not to notice.

So removed from reality is the president that it seems worthwhile to unpack two exchanges with reporters who asked about Kay's admission that he expects no weapons of mass destruction to be found in Iraq.

...

Leaving aside those incoherent references to "programs" and what the world obviously "felt," what is most notable in Bush's answer is that he again said Saddam "did not let us in." This is the second time he has made this weird statement, as if Hans Blix and UNMOVIC had never existed, nor conducted the most intrusive weapons inspections ever done in Iraq. (The first time was last July, when Bush said, in the presence of an astonished Kofi Annan: "And we gave [Saddam] a chance to allow the inspectors in, and he wouldn't let them in.")

How dare the press mock Howard Dean when they listen respectfully to this arrant lunacy?

still life
February 2nd, 2004, 06:32 AM
I heard that too and my jaw dropped. What did he think Hans Blix was doing, along with his team, for months?? Did he think they were sight-seeing??
I guess Mr Bush just wasn't paying attention. It's getting ridiculous when I know more about what's going on than the President of the United States does. Particularly when I don't have the abilty to send young military men and women to a foreign country to risk their lives. He does and has. It's like the country is being run by Alfred E. Neuman, to whom, coincidentaly, Mr Bush bears a strong resemblance. Craziness!!

But, almost more importantly, why is the press crediting Mr Bush with any intelligence at all? If you listen to the summary by the pundits of any of Mr Bush's appearances and speeches, especially if you heard the same speech or saw the same appearance, it's totally different. Usually I'm offended by having to see a group of people tell me what I just heard, but these are amazing.
Bush thanks everyone in the room for their hospitality, stumbles through a few pages of some speechwriter's cliche' filled notes, says "God Bless America" and absorbs the applause. Then the pundits tell us their interpretation of what we just heard. It's like they are in some parallel universe. Totally different. Weird.

Second Front
February 7th, 2004, 11:22 AM
Now Pat Roberts is repeating the same line: "Why didn't Saddam let the inspectors back in? We could have avoided this whole war."

Is the GOP hallucinating or just outright lying? It's increasingly difficult to tell.

George Bush=Intelligence Failure