Can someone point me to a good article, discussion, or even your own thoughts on what constitutes the difference between these 2 genres, specifically with respect to soloing. Obviously the simpler straight ahead grooves and progressions influenced the hard boppers style, but what else did they drop from the bebop bag? Were they less angular or obtusely syncopated? Were they bluesier? Did they prefer certain tunes to others, eg, did rhythm changes become less popular? What about patterns, formulas or devices? Which new ideas were incorporated into lines? When did MM modes get introduced?
And lastly, who do you think were the quintessential hard boppers? Not necessarily your faves, but who helped "write the book". I know, pretty broad questions, but.....
the wiki article is pretty good:
benny golson (jazztet)
donald byrd/gigi gryce
'trane (blue train, all prestige recordings)
...and wes, of course
I don't often reply to these as I view descriptives as a general guidance only. I would really only use such a description when someone said that they did not know the artist I was talking about and wanted to know what type of music they played. Beyond that, I find little use for description. It won't restrict my listening
From Charlie Parker to the Pasadena Roof Orchestra. From Anita O'Day to Julie London. They are all in my collection get listened to on a regular basis.
I have a label for that which is just as non-specific as every other music descriptive label It's called "Music that I like" I know what I mean -- no-one else does
Birth Controller to the Jazz Community. (click on the underlined text for more information)
sure, lots of other important players in that fertile time. for donaldson, i was thinking of
which is hard bop to my ears, from the title track on (amazon editorial blurb notwithstanding)...
mclean's work with sonny clark is surely essential hardbop...
OK, and how about the 2 Sonnys, Stitt and Rollins. Wouldn't they be equally important? If Eternal Triangle ain't a Hard Bop tour de force, then I really have no clue..... EDIT: just realised you had Rollins in there..... Which Curtis Counce album could you recommend?
Yep, sounds like I'd like it, cheers. So does anyone have anything to say about the difference in the soloists approach to soloing when comparing bebop to bop?
Is the Coltrane material from 57 to the early 60's considered hard bop? If not, then what is it considered? Thanks!!
hard bop: more structure, less 'frenzy'?
I agree with whoever said labels don't work so well as you'd like... ;-)
I'm just beginning to actually take this question seriously, as I've long had the mentality that "labels are for marketers who want to sell something and may or may not care about the music," but I just had a flash of some type of realization that this case it is simply a verbal label to enable one to discuss sub-genres within the types of Jazz, and could be very useful. Coming from the rock school, I was really into what many others and myself would easily label "Hard Rock" so it comes with a fresh perspective (some 10+ years later) after the fact. Then when you couple the further genre-twisting that began with the Jazz-Rock and the Fusion era, it makes me wonder about the descriptive words concepts behind the styles.
There is a "practical" reason to understand music labels/classifications. Before I hit a club, if I want to find out beforehand if a performer is playing a style of jazz I like, it's nice to have a word or two that generally describes their style. Same with having conversations with people about what style of jazz is liked. Or if you are looking for music you like in a store or reading an article that describes a music/artist style, it's nice to understand the definitions used. I've noticed there are a lot of great people into jazz (especially in this forum), but there are also some snobs that put their nose in the air if they don't like the question being asked. :-)
For Pete's sake! Let's not get into a discussion about the validity of naming sub genres! I'll make the question easier, when comparing players like Charlie Parker from the 40's and Golson/Griffin/Rollins/Adderley etc from the late 50's, what do you think are the major differences in the soloist's approach? Melodically, harmonically, rhythmically etc... Would love some specifics if you can share some. Thanks.
Never miss another jazz concert again! Jazz Near You is a simple yet powerful way for fans to discover who is playing where and when. Access local jazz events by date, by distance, by venue, by musician or by festival; map to venues, set reminders, and get detailed information about musicians. Jazz Near You is your complete guide to jazz music near you! Download it now.