jazz
HOME ARTICLES CD REVIEWS NEWS CALENDAR GUIDES MUSICIANS PHOTOS
Welcome Contests Daily MP3 Editorial Calendar Upcoming Releases Videos Contact Us

Go Back   Jazz Bulletin Board > Play Jazz > Music Theory and Analysis

Music Theory and Analysis Discuss composition, improvisational ideas, analysis of specific songs, recommended books and concepts, etc.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old December 5th, 2012, 07:58 AM   #31
kingfisher
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike A View Post
If a half cadence is defined as ending a section on V, that's used in countless standards at the end of the first A section, e.g., in an AABA form. It sets up a return to the tonic (or a tonic function substitute) as the first chord of the next A section. Is that what you're talking about?
That's exactly what I was talking about. Not sure they're important in jingles, the more I think about it. I guess it depends on how long the "jingle" is. Ending a section or a phrase on the V chord is precisely all I meant.
kingfisher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 5th, 2012, 08:12 AM   #32
jster
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 65
Quote:
Originally Posted by kingfisher View Post
That's exactly what I was talking about. Not sure they're important in jingles, the more I think about it. I guess it depends on how long the "jingle" is. Ending a section or a phrase on the V chord is precisely all I meant.
OK, good. I was beginning to think that there was a big misunderstanding going on. Whenever the word 'cadence' gets used in a jazz context, all hell breaks loose. Strictly speaking the half-cadences are at the ends of sections of classical music. I'm on the other computer, but I looked them up and they typically are at the end of one of the middle sections of a longer piece. And things really do come to rest. There is even the usual couple second delay before the next section begins.

For jazz guys, they are typically thinking of a half-cadence (if they think at all in those terms) as a V chord at the end of an A section as was said above. But sometimes you get a V-I right in the middle of an A section and nobody knows what to call that. Like I said, there was a big thread on the guitar site about it that was very unedifying.

--------------------------------------------------------------

OK, so back to the main issue:

So I know all my cadences. So I have my given melody that I came up with humming it in the shower. Then I sit down and try and figure out which of the bass notes I, IV or V works best. Now where do the minor chords come in? Do I just decide for example, that the sub dominant ii sounds better than the sub dominant IV and put that in? What I am trying to understand now at this moment is how a given melody in a vanilla diatonic functional context suggests/calls for a minor chord. (Let's assume that we are in a major key.) Above I was told to start by looking at the I, IV, V bass notes. OK, fine, but where do minor chords come in?
jster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 5th, 2012, 08:29 AM   #33
Mike A
Piano
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: So.Cal.USA
Posts: 888
Quote:
Originally Posted by jster View Post
Whenever the word 'cadence' gets used in a jazz context, all hell breaks loose.
Says who?
Mike A is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 5th, 2012, 08:38 AM   #34
jster
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 65
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike A View Post
Says who?
Well, I don't want to hijack my own thread with any more digressions about cadence definitions. But here is the thread to which I was referring:
http://www.jazzguitar.be/forum/theor...functions.html
And as you can see, there doesn't seem to be much agreement about how to use the term.
jster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 5th, 2012, 08:44 AM   #35
kingfisher
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by jster View Post
OK, so back to the main issue:

So I know all my cadences. So I have my given melody that I came up with humming it in the shower. Then I sit down and try and figure out which of the bass notes I, IV or V works best. Now where do the minor chords come in? Do I just decide for example, that the sub dominant ii sounds better than the sub dominant IV and put that in? What I am trying to understand now at this moment is how a given melody in a vanilla diatonic functional context suggests/calls for a minor chord. (Let's assume that we are in a major key.) Above I was told to start by looking at the I, IV, V bass notes. OK, fine, but where do minor chords come in?
The minor chords are often substitutions for the I, IV, or V. For example, in place of I you could choose iii or vi. You know all this already. For jingles, I think it really is as simple as choosing a chord and listening, choosing another and listening again. I mentioned previously that you should try to make the roots of the chords move either stepwise or by 4ths or 5ths. This idea, simple as it is, generally leads to several different chord progressions. You could then just try them and see which one sounds best to you.
kingfisher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 5th, 2012, 08:52 AM   #36
jster
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 65
Quote:
Originally Posted by kingfisher View Post
The minor chords are often substitutions for the I, IV, or V. For example, in place of I you could choose iii or vi. You know all this already. For jingles, I think it really is as simple as choosing a chord and listening, choosing another and listening again. I mentioned previously that you should try to make the roots of the chords move either stepwise or by 4ths or 5ths. This idea, simple as it is, generally leads to several different chord progressions. You could then just try them and see which one sounds best to you.
Thanks. That helps a great deal.

As an aside, they are actually a step up from jingles. In some cases, I have just borrowed progressions from standards as per advice from jazz oud. But the best ones typically begin with a melody, so I am trying to get better at harmonizing.

There are lots of discussions about re-harmonization but not so many about harmonization. Most of the harmonization discussions that I have found are on songwriter websites and seem a bit superficial. So I just want to get an idea of how the Broadway guys think about it.
jster is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
stella by starlight ilan diamond Music Theory and Analysis 55 February 17th, 2012 06:44 PM
Keith Jarrett interview 2009 CoyotePalace General Music Discussion 0 August 10th, 2009 03:05 PM
Priceless books Professor Jones Music Theory and Analysis 65 May 7th, 2009 06:13 AM
Mixolydian over Minor Chords Ianant Musician 2 Musician 47 March 29th, 2009 01:20 PM
Playing the melody on guitar zippetyzyp Musician 2 Musician 41 September 18th, 2006 08:40 PM




Use the All About Jazz content widgets on your website or blog Widgets Subscribe to the All About Jazz RSS feeds Feeds Visit All About Jazz at Twitter Twitter Visit All About Jazz at Facebook Facebook

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.