|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Music Theory and Analysis Discuss composition, improvisational ideas, analysis of specific songs, recommended books and concepts, etc. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#31 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 10
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 10
|
Wow, I missed all this activity regarding my post; I didn't have email notification set and was oblivious to the activity.
Thank you all for your contributions (although I would certainly welcome more). Aydin, I found your insights on the subject interesting. As a guitarist, I know for a fact that many of the most popular and effective voicings for dominant 11th chords usually omit the 3rd which avoids the dissonance you refer to whereas minor 11ths typically have the b3 present. A lot of this seems to tie in with the late great Emily Remler's assertion that states:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3
|
Girl from Ipanema Analysis
Quote:
however: "Am7 is ii7 of VI in F (secondary ii7);" I am a bit confuse about you analysis ii7 of VI in F? The 6° in F is vi (D minor) right? .... then ii of vi would be Edim chord... Am7, isn't just a iii7 in F? Best A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
Piano/Compose/Arrange
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Pátzcuaro, Michoacán, México
Posts: 7,188
|
Quote:
Yes, it was an obvious typo; he meant iii7. Ed's been off this Forum since 2009. Cheers, Jer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Piano
Join Date: May 2007
Location: So.Cal.USA
Posts: 888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Piano/Compose/Arrange
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Pátzcuaro, Michoacán, México
Posts: 7,188
|
Oops, right, Mike. The typo was the VI for II.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 135
|
Ed basically had it right, I think he just used a shorthand notation (it's hard to follow with all the slashes and lower case i's). I think what he meant is similar to what Mike is saying; that the Am7 is IIm7 of V7/II.
Melodically though there is another factor to add in. The Am7 is a dual function chord, also functioning as IIIm7 as Jerry says. The analysis symbols then would have Am7 and D7b9 connected via a horizontal bracket indicating that Am7 is a related IIm7 of a secondary dominant. V7/II would be written above the secondary dominant D7. The important additional notation would be IIIm7 in parentheses written above the Gm7. For melodic purposes the (IIIm7) notation typically overrides the melodic tendency of the related IIm7 analysis. Notice the Jobim melody has the F note, not an F# as you would expect if Am7 was primarily functioning as a IIm7. |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3
|
That makes more sense!
Thanks you all for replying... A. Ps and thanks for the welcome and prompt replies!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3
|
Quote:
I see now what you say... ii7 in G would require an F# (for Dorian) ... So I'll have to agree with you... is a hinge chord, I guess. Best A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | |
|
Guitarist
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 78
|
Quote:
That said, iii leading to VI7 also gives a nice opportunity to combine a maj 6 with a b9, a neat melodic minor mode... |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| Widgets | Feeds |